RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05753
COUNSEL: NO
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His 11 Dec 12 Fitness Assessment (FA) results reflect an abdominal circumference (AC) measurement of 38 inches and a composite score of 76.2.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The Fitness Assessment Center (FAC) member who measured his waist did not verify the proper location on top of his hip bone. He placed the tape measure around the applicants stomach instead. A second taping was conducted by a certified Physical Training Leader (PTL), and his correct AC measurement was 38 inches.
The applicants complete submission is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant served in the Regular Air Force in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) during the matter under review.
The applicants most recent FA results are as follows:
Date
Composite Score
Rating
21 Feb 13
84.20
Satisfactory
11 Dec 12
74.40
Unsatisfactory
25 Sep 12
46.80
Unsatisfactory
28 Mar 12
81.40
Satisfactory
30 Sep 11
77.10
Satisfactory
3 Mar 11
77.80
Satisfactory
3 Dec 10
68.80
Unsatisfactory
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is included at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program, The tester will start the measurement on the right side of the Airman. The tester will locate the measurement landmark immediately above the right uppermost hip bone (superior border of the iliac crest) at the side of the body vertically in line with the right armpit. If desired, the Airman may assist the tester in locating the measurement landmark by resting the right hand on the hip, using rearward facing right thumb to locate the iliac crest. The tester will determine final horizontal-vertical intersection point for landmark confirmation. It is not mandatory for the applicant to find his hip bone; it is only voluntary for the Airman to confirm. The applicant has not provided any documentation to indicate the AC measurement was done improperly.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 May 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
4. The applicants case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05753 in Executive Session on 19 Dec 13, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Panel Chair
Member
Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Dec 12.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 29 Apr 13, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 May 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03418
If any of the measures differ by more than one inch from the other two, the tester will take an additional measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04720
The Airman may use one hand to initially assist the tester in anchoring the tape measure to the body, but must remove the hand from the tape measure before the official measurement is recorded. The tester will ensure tape is parallel to the floor at the level of the landmark (bottom edge of the tape just contacts landmark), is snug, but does not compress the bare skin. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02245
Other testers have been improperly measured at the same location. The tester will ensure tape is parallel to the floor at the level of the landmark (bottom edge of the tape just contacts landmark), is snug, but does not compress the bare skin. While the applicant has provided personal statements, a letter from her unit PTL, and an eyewitness statement from another Airman indicating that the AC measurement component of the contested FA may have been administered incorrectly, she has not met...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00451
When his waist was measured, the landmark was an inch above the right uppermost hip bone. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04264
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04264 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His fitness assessment (FA), dated 24 August 2012, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The Officer in Charge (OIC) told him that it was too late for another measurement as had already left the measuring room. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03388
After completing his FA, he requested his Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM) -re- accomplish an AC measurement. The tester will record this value as the AC measurement. The applicant did not provide his fitness score sheet nor did he provide documentation from the FAC acknowledging the error and an invalidation memorandum from the Unit Commander indicating his/her decision to invalidate the FA. While we note the applicant's stated request to have the entire FA removed, we believe the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05629
She was re-measured a week later by a different FAC member [witnessed by the Unit Fitness Program Manager (UFPM)], and her measurements were, height (66 inches) and waist (30.5 inches). DPSIM states that the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence that would indicate the 5 Sep 12 AC measurement did not comply with the Air Force Instruction. The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04203
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-04203 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 30 Mar 12, 11 Jun 12, and 14 Jun 12, Fitness Assessments (FAs) be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03771
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03771 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 18 Jul 13 Fitness Assessment (FA) be declared void and removed from his records. Therefore, in view of the fact the evidence before us indicates the applicants AC measurement has never been above 35.5 inches (2006), and his AC measurement was recorded as 32.5 inches during an FA taking place only days after...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05762
The 30 Space Wing Fitness Assessment Cell (FAC) would not allow him to take another official AC measurement that same day, so he retook the test on 5 Dec 12. On 4 Dec 12, the applicant took his FA; however, he did not meet the minimum requirement for the AC component with a measurement of 40. On the same day, his commander approved his request to retest within the 42 day reconditioning period in accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2905, Fitness Program. We took notice of the applicants...